performance - c# unit test akward runtime -


I am developing a C # tool in Visual Studio 2013 on Win8.

I just started paying the depts for the unit testing (shame on me;)) on a very easy part:

is a class for geometrical vectors Wanted to check whether the init works below given code.

It was found that the sequence of test methods is very strange: when running from the time of test 

  TestCreateNonZeroVertex & lt; 1ms TestCreateZeroVertex 4ms TestModifyVertex & lt; 1ms

Many times executed in the sequence (to eliminate some of the system's buffering stuff) First consideration: Garbage collector -> Forced GC in tampering (with waiting for finishing) Result: Expansion of time (as expected) but proportional 

  testcreateNonZeroVertex 2ms TestCreateZeroVertex TestModifyVertex 2ms

There is a bit more fact about the 8ms (for 13ms with peaks) TestModifyVertex defacto TestCreateZeroVertex + X, I do not understand this discrepancy. Is it because TestCreateZeroVertex is the first method in TestSuite? If so, it seems like a bug in the test environment for me. (Why is the share of disappointment broken?)

If someone can explain, why is the time so strong, and how can this shift (for compairability) To finish off, I want to be very grateful.

Start of class here: 

  Public class vertex {public double X {get; Set; } Public double y [receive; Set; } Receive public double jade { Set; } Public Vertex () {X = 0; Y = 0; Z = 0; } Public Vertex (double x, double y, double z) {X = x; Y = y; Z = z; } ...

Very easy.

I used some test methods: 

  [TestMethod] Public Zero TestCreateZeroVertex () {Vertix v = New Vertex (); Assurance.Arequansal & lt; Double & gt; (0.0, v.X, "X value expected to be zero, is:" + v.x); Assign. Eraqual & lt; Double & gt; (0.0, v.Y, "expected y value to be zero, is:" + v.Y); Responsibility.Arequal & lieutenant; Double & gt; (0.0, VJ., "Z value expected to be zero, is:" + v.z); } [Testimede] Public Zero Test Content Nonzerovatex () {Double X = 1.1, Y = 2.2, z = 3.3; Vertex v = new vertex (X, Y, Z); Assurance.Arequal & lieutenant; Double & gt; (X, vx, "expected x value" + x + "yes, this is:" + v.x); Assurance.Are Aquel & lt; Double & gt; (Y, v.Y, "expected y value" + Y + ", is:" + v.Y); Responsibility.Arequal & lt; Double & gt; (Z, v.z, "expected z value" + z + ", is:" + v.z); } [TestMethod] Public Zero TestModifyVertex () {Double X = 1.1, y = 2.2, z = 3.3; Vertex v = new vertix (); Assurance.Arequansal & lt; Double & gt; (0.0, v.X, "X value expected to be zero, is:" + v.x); Assign. Eraqual & lt; Double & gt; (0.0, v.Y, "expected y value to be zero, is:" + v.Y); Responsibility.Arequal & lieutenant; Double & gt; (0.0, VJ., "Z value expected to be zero, is:" + v.z); V.X = x; V.Y = y; V.Z = z; Assurance.Arequal & lieutenant; Double & gt; (X, vx, "expected x value" + x + "yes, this is:" + v.x); Assurance.Are Aquel & lt; Double & gt; (Y, v.Y, "expected y value" + Y + ", is:" + v.Y); Responsibility.Arequal & lt; Double & gt; (Z, v.z, "expected z value" + z + ", is:" + v.z); }

When your tests are different VS 2012 The test explorer throws they look less or more overdue periods - Some MSs display the same results as they are all executing them, as shown in the question, although in my case TestModifyVertex a Running for a long time.

Without doing extensive research, I'm loading some class issue here - your code may be or (which is probably the case here, as your example is quite compact) some MSTest (Or any tester you are using) code The following tests may get some benefits from the classes already loaded.

So you can try to run each test separately for comparable results, but I do not think this is a good idea. We have tried to detect the decrease in performance in the same way, but have abandoned many false positive reasons. MSTE is not a suitable device for this.

Depending on your visual studio version, try the test profile to get more information about what is happening.


-

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

sqlite3 - UPDATE a table from the SELECT of another one -

I have the first table article where some data is missing. In the table, articles_tmp I have a part of the missing data. So I want to update the articles. Where the path path is data in articles_tmp.path where the path is not zero . With SQLite , it does not work: update article SET path = (SELECT at.path FROM Articles_tmp as AS, WHERE at.article_id = a.id and a.asp, the text is in the form and not on. It has been transmitted) where the path is null MS Access Along with, it works fine: Update Articles Join the Inner Articles at articles_tmp articles.id = articles_tmp.id SETP articles.path = articles_tmp.path Can anyone help? Sin CE SQL Server Syntax, which I provided, was not working, here this solution With whom I have come. A little modification of your original query, but with my "correlation" suggestion added. There is a SQL Bella for this: Here is the code: update article SET path = (SELECT path from articles_tmp AS T WHERE t.id
Read more

c# - Showing a SelectedItem's Property -

So I have enabled a rightclick option for my DataGrid. I want to display the only chosen property but it is not behaving like what I would like it to display my name and additional. Public category Paymentinfo {public int PaymentNo {get; Set; } Public string date {get; Set; } Public Double Pay {get; Set; } Public Double Principle {get; Set; } Public Double Interest {get; Set; } Public Double Balance {Received; Set; }} Private Zero MenuItem_OnClick (Object Sender, RoutedEventArgs e) {MessageBox.Show (AmortGrid.SelectedItem.ToString ()); } I'm trying to apply it without using a View Module! If I place a breakpoint where the messagebox and the recipient place it on selected ITEM, then this property will display the payment. A date-payment-principle-interest-balance is the only value that needs payment. Was hoping that it would be something like this MessageBox.Show (AmortGrid.SelectedItem.PaymentNo.ToString ()); When you call ToString () So you get the class typ
Read more

javascript - Render HTML after each iteration in loop -

I'm trying to gradually increase the font size of text on a web page. The code works in my place, although the new HTML / CSS does not render after every iteration of the loop and when all this is done, then display only the text of 100 px size. To see the text as if it is slowly zooming, I need to do this JavaScript is down because it is being used from a different file here is what I have ... < Pre> & lt; P class = "game-title" style = "font-size: 50px" & gt; Test & lt; / P & gt; Function sleep (milliseconds) {var start = new date (). GetTime (); For (var i = 0; i & lt; 1e7; i ++) {if ((new date). GetTime () - start) & gt; Milliseconds {break; CSS ('font-size', 'parseInt ($ (' game-title '). CSS (' font-size ')) + 1 + "pixels"); } While (parasont ($ ('# text'). Css ('font-size')) & lt; = 100) {sleep (1000); IncreaseSize (); Using CSS: Use of jQuery (sample):
Read more